. . . learning General truths and
the Universal eternity . . . .
- it seems that for those with sufficiently eternal experience the following
theory is partially real,,...
This is a learning attempt route at reading the one-track
mindfulness into the vast unlimited infinitely limited
If you see some self-limited thinking it's
probably because I was self-limited &<#
material, all, infinity, Lord, God, causality - diversity of influence,
creation, individuality - point of view and ordering, evolution
- progress and regress, success and failure, will and effect, eternal time,
history and space, time-travel, variety, pattern and potency.
Big introductory results:
Envisaging, describing and summarising eternity
Think: infinitely many unique categories of irreduceable elemental
Suppose: All conceivable is not all possible...
To prove: Requires to know that the infinite all IS all AND no more.
Our proving (specifics) and knowing (generalities), our language use and abstractions
may all increase and decrease between maximums and minimums - if it is our fate,
yet, for all of us - we will come to find infinite pleasures and likings
in our lives which stay infinite always....
Knowing Truth: God puts eternity into human hearts...
Perhaps for some infinite beings eternity may be scoured in search
of confirmation or contradiction of logical statements...
This provides a mechanism that God uses to make us certain
of the truth or falsity of any relevant statements we can analyse...
Our being can scan the eternal universe, by God's enablement,
for any evidence to the contrary of any comprehendable statement
and if we fail to come up with negative results we can be sure,
having scoured all experience in existence, and having found evidence that
the statement is in someway true.
Many things then - various extremes of evil
and suffering - are entirely imaginary
- they cannot exist in the realm of perceivable observation.
The extreme limit of evil is always impossible to know, perceive,
observe or even to imagine - it has been considered and found wanting
and evaluated to be undesirable and banned from further appreciation
Some merely imaginary experiences never become fully known and/or
Imaginations are experiences in which the identities, timings and positions
can be viewed ambiguously and flexibly abstracted in relation to those
identities, timings and positions which are experienced to be shared with others
and called real.
The Generality Code:
The Whole Truth of eternal existence - entirely decribable by means
of logical statements
that follow logically from the entirely discernable axioms
All logically consistent codes and true definitions are beyond contradiction...
So that the Truth when fully experienced
does not contradict itself anywhere
and no paradox is intractable - all can be explained and described
logically and coherently - so nothing is beyond the reach of
codification or language - including language code using finite or infinitesimal
It is possible to have impossibilities - impossibilities are possibilities
that remain hypothetical and cannot be enriched in any actualisable form.
Absolute impossibilities can never happen to anyone ever and are not
permitted to be experienced in any way - not even in the imagination,
so attempts to experience them will always result in thought-block and/or distraction.
Where there is any experience, whether of time or space or what fills them,
there is the consideration of abstract causality - things that can be
imagined to cause it in various ways, also the consideration of
degrees of identification with each part of the experience - how the
experience seems to belong each beings individual point of view,
and then there is the consideration of how much and in what way
the experience is a success or failure of each action of the will
in the instants of time that preceed the change and the sequential experience.
Giving and taking, belief or worry and doubts as well as hopes and fears
may all be perceived as causing any aspect of the future and hence have will
- some causal nature attached to them.
The Lord God of the entire eternal universe creates, supplies and uses
the Force and generalised Causality by which the future and past are determined
and consists of a Collective of infinitely many Beings
Who are only ever using the good side of Causality, to force all other beings
in the passing of time, to
reject the sinful side of force and comply with God's Own use
of the Force for generosity and truth and freedom to find happy reward.
The Enemy of God uses theft, lies and captivity to cause the finite temporary
sadness which is later banned forever by God.
Of course The Lord may punish those who have generosity, truth and freedom
and use the good side force with pains even if they are as just and good as
the Lord because pains may come without theft, without lies and without captivity
as the Christ considered as one with God's good nature suffered whilst
only using the good side of force... Holiness is the quality of the Lord's nature
as using only good force. Holy means separated to God's use.
The Lord may be considered in a threefold way.... The Holy Parent is the fulness
of the Lord God, the Holy Spirit is the non-incarnate holy identity
of the Lord God in various degrees of fulness, and the Holy Child or Sibling
is an incarnation of a smaller kind than the Parent.
In Israeli-Christian tradition these Three divisions of the Collective
of Ideally Good Lords and Gods named as 'Lord' and 'God' are traditionally
termed 'the Father', 'the Holy Spirit', and 'the Son'.
Difference and uniqueness transcends similarity, symmetry and repetition.
Difference - complexity of pattern and asymmetry contain more complexity
for the same number of constituent elements than similarity and symmetry.
There are three considerations - difference with similarity, difference alone
and similarity alone or sameness.
In the infinite ordering of all things
- the oneness of infinity means that infinity and the eternal universe
is one size - the same size as the natural numbers: 1,2...
All infinite continuums can be counted by the natural numbers.
It is possible to assign unique essential experiences to identify
specifically each person in the universe. Numbers are essentially repetitions
of addition of same to same. Yet experiences such as colours are essentially
distinguished by their difference from all the other colours - this
difference transcends the repetition of numbers. Therefore colours
are a more transcendent way of uniquely naming or tagging a person
to distinguish them from all the other people, than numbers are.
The all is the complete collection of beings who collectively have all orders
of experience and contain maximum variety of experience. They can be
imagined to relate to the ordering of all experiences in the most varied way.
If you lack belief-choices for an number of outcomes then probability is an option
which is based on faith in your complete knowledge of surroundings
conditions and the statistical laws governing the outcome and may be used to
spread one's belief across a number of choices in a systematic way.
But through any infinitesimal
chink of ignorance in a probability system might come any random infinite
universe of experience... The only safe way to predict has to involve
proof or knowledge - certainty - by experiencing the result already
before the change - in other words time-richness of experience
- experiencing things before and after a change - having experience
of the future and past either side of the change involved.
The only way to escape time's constraints is to experience more of time
- to experience all of time's history together is to be time-rich
- not timeless. To be timeless is the constraint of complete inability
to appreciate time's ordering of the eternal universe. To experience
all of time's history together means being 'accelerated' with an infinitely
accelerated ability to experience more of the infinitely rich
The subjective speed of time at which each portion of concurrently
experienced objective history is experienced for each being can seem
to take diversely various spans of time for various beings.
Also, within any concurrent time involving the experiences of several beings,
each being may progress through spans of the objective shared history
which they can experience - through richer or poorer subsets of the overall
shared experience history, in ways that are more or less than the richness
with which the other beings can experience the same overall objective
history span. So time has a subjective sense of duration for any objective
duration of shared history. And time supplies a varyingly selected
subset of the experience histories therein to the various beings
who experience time's windows onto objectively shared experiences.
Concurrently, while you experience some of my future
- I may be limited to recalling some of your past...
Also in the glorious mix that time reveals to us,
is the various various experiences of time travel
for various beings - with additions to history
by travel into future or past history - permanently erasing unhappiness and
suffering from past history, and affecting a removal of all unhappiness
and suffering from the ultimate future also.
Any given span of objective history may be experienced in varying
periods of duration of subjective time... Time has a beginning
whereas history does not...
In a finite moment of time an infinite future history and
infinite past history may be experienced... Infact any permitted
beginningless and endless history may be experienced at a point instant
of time with infinitesimal duration - the history order-line
of such an infinite history can be imagined as a second objective history
dimension crossing the subjective time dimension (or objective
time dimension - wherever concurrent objective history experience is
subjectively experienced as enriched to the same degree
with the objective history in each participating being).
Time begins as an infinite series of changes
issuing from the initially full
experience of all the good experiences
in existence throughout time in which all eternity was experienced
also excepting the suffering caused by sins and punishments
- an original ideal and full eternal universe...
God and the universe has a beginning in subjective durational time
because God didn't
want to spend an infinite past time in waiting for the finite time period
when sin and suffering were to be experienced.
So God and the universe have a beginning in time and whilst they inherit a
beginningless and everlasting history in time they come from
a definite durational-time origin.
God and the universe do originate with an infinite past history
- but this is only experienced from time's origin for a finite period
of time after which this infinite past is added to by the events
that unfold due to time's ordering of eternity.
The idea of eternal time-history then, can be visualised variously from
the eventual continuance of eternal time-history.
Eternal time has a beginning.
Eternal history has no beginning but the experience of the endless
beginning in an eternal history - so the various subset histories
of the full objective history of eternity always originally take place
in a finite period of time, after which eternal histories
may be experienced over infinite duration.
Time connects all experiences into a specific order - including all the
various possible complete histories that have infinite past and future.
So that time makes possible to experience infinitely rich histories
from infinite pasts to infinite futures within finite time periods
so that time transcends history.
All eternity is fixed by God to be in the overall order that He desires,
whilst many things happen simultaneously also - perhaps happening in
various orders for various beings. Past history cannot be undone
- what happens has had real existence. Whilst past history can be added
onto the past as time progresses, the evil and unhappiness becomes forever
forgotten - and in this way is 'erased' from future experience of the past,
and that past experience of the past is permanently forgotten.
God is the Lord, Creator, and Master of surprise for all time...
Iyehuweh God is always the First to experience ALL the greatest
experiences of change - big and small, happy, pleasureable, sad, or painful,
that follow according to His eternally changeless plan
by His immutable determination.
God uses the changes in the hypothetical
challenges He presents us with teach us about His unchanging guiding
principles that determine what changes He makes to His temporary
hypothetical plans for us... So we must each learn to make good and happiness,
sin and suffering cancel out sin and suffering - according to the ideal mission
of temporary reality.
Beings, as well as being composed of part-beings or sub-beings,
have whole eternal futures incommon with other beings who have differing
eternal pasts. Also beings continually spawn from their own commonly
held eternal past experience - offspring beings who have differing
eternal futures. So beings continually subdivide into beings with various
futures and fuse together from beings that are various in the past.
All position and motion is relative yet there are always ranking
views of the position and motion of the universe - for instance this ranking view
according to the origin state of the universe -
Where Mama means the First, Papa means the Second and Child means the
Third in rank at the beginning and some 'least ranking' being at the origin is
It is philosophically easy to consider the initial axioms of the
'axiomatic compass' for the mathematical system that calculates
all absolute positions, absolute relative velocities and
absolute velocities relative to an assumed zero velocity element..
This view is sourced as follows from these assumptions;
that the Mama's greatest element is considered
as absolute centre of the universe, that the Mama's greatest element
is assumed as always having the assymetry of a direction of motion directly
away from the Papa's greatest element, that the Child's greatest element
is used to fix the absolute relative velocity between the greatest element of the
Mama and the greatest element of the Papa in that line in which the Mama's
greatest element is considered to be moving away from the Papa's greatest element,
and that the absolute velocities of all elements in the universe are then
determined starting from the additional consideration that
the least element of the least ranking creature in eternity always
having the absolute zero motion in the line by which the Mama's greatest
element is considered as directed away from the Papa's greatest element....
All the velocities of all elements of all beings within this line and
within other dimensions relative to this line can be determined from this
starting calculation - but the remaining calculations become rapidly infinite
in nature due to the infinite number of beings in existence and the
complexity of each creature's experience history in eternal time...
. . . 1
General Truths . . . .
It is clear in
the conscience that God demands sufficiently mentally endowed humanity
to plan and strategise and force intelligently
according to the recogisable laws of nature's
currently intelligible cause and effect patterns so as to try to achieve
identifiable results at least within certain degrees of approximaton.
And this means trying and/or doing as the basis for moral accountability.
One thing is needed: By loving God with all of your being
- essence, spirit, soul, and body you may automatically love all
of His creatures in the most loving way you can.
Ideal love for God also ensures simultaneous love for the creation.
Also he who loves his human brother indicates that he loves God also
for all creatures are part of God.
God's self-denying love compels us ever and anon to put priority preference
to paying our eternal debt to meet God's and others good desires for themselves
before our last minimum priority debt to meet our good desires for ourselves.
God respects fairly without partiality so He loves unequally in proportion
to a being's worth and importance - bringing some more quickly
than others into His full and good experience of eternity,
yet He eventually shares all that He has with all.
Jacob He loved and Esau He hated - although He loves all the creation
- God makes some to sin more than others and makes some to forgive and
be forgiven while locking others up in unforgiveness - whom
He punishes for their unforgiven sins in hades and/or the lake of fire.
Time and history is determined by a game between truth and falsity...
The part of your conscience that you use to decide what to choose may
determine the outcome or may predict a false outcome
depending on whether your conscience is true or false on that issue...
The hypothetical outcomes in your conscience
that you don't choose along with the outcome that
you do choose are there to help you
to form, in the present moment, true or false understandings
between you, and the other beings you have consciousness of, concerning
how they will attempt to determine or actually determine the outcome -
for that event for which you choose any particular option...
And the broadcast part of your conscience says what you will attempt and/or do
in the event that they choose their option.
Between this interplay of expectations being held and read by others
we find that we can have beliefs reegarding the appointment times of the
events we expect and we may give from our wilfulness to achieve any
gifts or exchanges at the times we believe we will be there for each other.
Effect may cause its own cause...
Abstract cause and abstract effect are both true of any element of any
experience in relation to any other.
It is equally true to say that everyone causes you to be who you are as
that you cause you to be who you are. All experience causes any experience,
any experience causes all experience and any experience causes any experience
- it cannot be disproved except by simply not experiencing causation's fulness
for a time.
The Revelation to John teaches that God in Christ can be considered as the
origin and the consummation - essentially this says that He is cause
and effect in the most profound way.
So God can be understood to cause effects in the most transcendent way.
God and His Son are the greatest
Initiators and Perfectors of every new development incorporating
through Their omnipresent transcendence the beginning and ending form
in each view of any process of by which a goal is achieved from an origin status.
For many God's will is one so that throughout God's plural nature all agree.
However, the all is the complete collection of beings who collectively have all
orders of experience and collectively contain maximum variety of experience.
They can be imagined to relate to the ordering of all experiences in the most
varied way - although this involves the conflict of the choices, desires
and efforts they hold in regard to life's experiences.
...The choices of the all include the setting of rules of consequence
that limit the amount of choices and their outcomes
and makes creatures responsible for choosing to
bring various doubts and confusions as to what people are choosing
and what will happen in the future.
Conscience is a tendency to choose to rely on, or put faith in,
a present story-commentary about the impending consequences of choice
and then conscience guides the actual desire to choose
a subsequent course of action from those believed to be available.
This tendency to use a map of hypothetical futures - as if they all speak
with equal validity of the actual future you attempt to choose - in order to
make your next choice involves belief in a set of rules of consequence.
Even though all but one hypothetical choice remains hypothetical in the
immediate future, these choices may be recalled and remain relevant in the future,
as they are used to assess whether the correct or most desired choice
was made, since considerations/feelings about these
previous hypothetical options varies with time
as part of the moral learning of the being with the desire
to choose and conscience to guide this will...
The learning is either
about understanding of what is considered good or bad choice in terms of
overall later reward (good) or punishment (bad), or,
what are the changing desires of the being faced with the choices
with regard to similar choices as and when they come around again
- either the desires fix onto reward or punishment, so either the conscience
regarding outcomes of reward or punishment aligns with a general pattern -
producing codes of conduct or the pattern seems random and patterns of
behaviour resulting from the conscience are equally random...
Conscience may be considered as something to seek Truth with - either
reward or punishment - a way to find the outcome you consider correct or
desirable, or else conscience is an entertainer to entertain you in the present
with hypothetical ideas that are of little further use except as entertainment.
Without prophetic knowledge (a knowing that experiences someone's future)
or knowledge of rules of choice-consequence
the results of your choices are a complete surprise - however much the
expectations, beliefs or wilfulness.
God tests us by sending us displeasure and we test Him when we sin...
God's kingdom is the rule of freedom...
Freedom is the ability to be rewarded with power to determine
your destiny. Freedom is transcendent ability to determine by the action
of the will. Freedom of the will and determinism are two views on one
concept of a difference of potency of the desires or wills of beings
in the terms of their ability to achieve what they want
- a difference of potency that makes an assymetry between wills
and forms a hierarchy of wills according to the positive effectiveness
of the choices the beings make in time to achieve what they want.
God tunes all the efforts of the desires and choices in beings to
seek what His ideal will seeks - as each find their own way to the greatness of
God by first finding the lesser aspects of God.. And thus many come
to find the greater aspects of God that allow them to achieve what they want, as
they like to desire it and and share God's absolute freedom of desire and will
by whatever amount of efforts.
The greatest goal for any being is to grow to experience
all of the experience of everything
- clearly none but God experience it in exactly the same ordering as God or
they would be that 'God' - and not all come to experience the totality they guess
at, expect or believe for - perhaps even believing for a while
that they experience all of God yet not having proof or knowledge
and then maybe finding out what they were lacking...
Giving and receiving cannot always be simultaneous.
Giving may sometimes be at the expense of receiving
- selfish modes of receiving hinder some ways to give,
however what is received allows more to be given eventually...
It can be loving to allow a gift to pass you by in order to reach
another than to grasp it as yours first - yet what if the giver's intention
was for you to receive the gift first?
Some gifts may multiply once received so that many may receive
and so that one may give without losing - to be shared.
Jesus' example of great love involved total self-denial
- to deny yourself means letting people be free to experience
your private experience in any way that God desires. It means making your
self entirely loyal to try and/or do God's will to the extent that He
fills you with His ability to give and love. As far as love's self-sacrifice
for the good of others goes, God does not allow us to be tested by this to an extent
that causes our hope in optimism to fully die...
Randomness is complexity of an operation still untraced.
Chance indicates ignorance of prophetic knowledge.
The contrasting of the words 'order' and 'chaos' as if they were mutually
exclusive by general definitions is fallacy... Chaos has order to it like anything
and often the words that would better convey
the concepts experienced are the 'complexity' or the 'simplicity'
of the rules known to be governing the situation.
Without expectations, and beliefs or will/desire
to give or take concerning one's destiny - these things cannot be met by a destiny
that meets these demands and thus makes God's will seem to be
more than random chance. These parts of our mindfulness make patterns possible
between our destiny and our present situation and likewise the possible existence
of laws of change spanning across the change that stands between us and our
destiny... So love, trust and hope enable order to be discerned in our lives.
Regrets are a curious basis for re-inventing ourselves...
Regrets needn't be unhappy and needn't involve the destructive feeling
of wishing a thing had never happened...
Whatever happens has to happen - it is all
necessary for some purpose - to help us all to develop.
You can't change what happened but true regret reconsiders the past to
learn from God a better way of acting in a similar future set of events.
So one might say 'I regret not that I did it but I regret to do it again'.
An easy way to develop wisdom and a critical mind is to read through
collections of quotations and learn to disregard the somewhat simplistic
attempts to make generalisations - a step further is to learn to imagine
how they could be better phrased as more specifically oriented quotes...
Or even, perhaps, to apprehend that they can associate in the mind
to a true generalisation concerning some related subject matter.
The majority of the so-called fictional stories record in detail the facts
of what has already happened to real people, often ages ago and
in previous incarnations... or - of course - what will happen in an apparently
. . . 2
The Eternal Universe . . . .
Some people think God only creates others
think God destroys too.. Now, God - as the creativity of all is
greater than the all in that His
eternally good attentions, decisions and behaviours prevail and eventually
completely dominate everywhere. In doing justice God seeks to make people happy
eventually and leaves the Enemy to make people unhappy. In being greater than
all this 'Father' of Christ is not thwarted - except temporarily -
in His desire, will and action to make all fully happy.
The Enemy makes us all suffer the same amount of unhappiness and then His or Her
will can never again cause us sadness whether by creativity or destructivity.
The Destroyer whether God or the Enemy as regards happiness
can destroy all in people's lives except our eventual permanence
of full happiness...
To be a being or experiencer is the basis of reality. One's identity is a
basis for deciding one's ownership within the experience overall of your being's
Ownership is defined simply as zones of one's elemental experiences where
we experience things more than once by means of the ability to count
and experience things to degrees of intensity beyond degree one.
Usually our identity is defined by our conception of causality
- the will or the force of other's will - what owns the will or what the will owns
defines an identity within one's being. When ownership is associated
with causality we call it will. When ownership is not associateed with
causual elements we assign it the name force. Efforts may be deemed to
will or cause or force actions through change yet in principle so equivalently
a colour might be deemed to cause by will or force also. Our identity might
be divorced from our efforts - depending if we think we own our efforts.
There may be beings who differ from you by only one infinitesimal
element of experience in all of eternity - so that you may be considered
collectively with those sharing big amounts of your exact experience
as if you were like clones sharing large amounts of your substance
like conjoined twins.
People - beings may find they divide into two or more beings
and then multiplicities of beings may have their experiences
merge together perhaps after some change and/or period of time
in which for a while they were separate by lacking experience of each other.
So being is one experience - 'you' and 'me' are for some incidental temporary
terms for our being joined into the experience of being an 'us'.
Time is a transient experience of all the experiences of all change
in eternity that merely experience all of time,
unpopulated by the other experiences in time,
going forwards or backwards infinitesimal step by infinitesimal step
- so that nothing but mathematically related experiences of empty change
Yet the fully populated eternity is the collective experience of the all
- They experience time, full of all experiences,
in the maximum number of ways in the greatest collection of orderings.
If a being is in time, time is in the being.
God may experience all of time for a while with all of its senses
of change - forwards and backwards - all this even within an infinitesimal
instant of time and with total population of beings and ideal experience.
History in time's change sequences allows us to have durations involved
in the change scenario of time as well as other elements of function
Things go in and out of existence as sequenced by time
- which is a dynamic filter of the greatest instantaneous experience,
so that time creates the experience of all
beings by multiple dynamic subtractions from it.
Time may appear full of all the current events in the universe
or time may for a long while sequence a series of lesser experiences
- subsets of the universal experience.
A being may experience a lesser beings' ignorance as well as experiencing
its other experiences.
The entire creation is the collection of all currently existing beings
who are either firstly non-existent from infinite past history,
receiving their created existence with a finite past history,
or the remainder, whose existence has an infinite past history,
both categories of which include creatures who are
temporarily annihilated and re-created.
Mathematically speaking, God can be counted by the ever extending number
sequence - the natural numbers.
Also true is that many other infinite beings exist
that can be counted by the natural numbers
- for instance any one that, unlike God, doesn't exist
with infinite past history, but when they first come
to exist in time have a finite past history
yet continue to exist for infinite time future...
Infinite ordering of all things
- the oneness of infinity - infinity is one size:
The natural numbers 1,2,3,4,5.. extended infinitely
contain an infinite number of infinite sequences and so are
able to count or sequence the real numbers and infact all things by
means of an infinite 'bootstrapped' correspondence...
(For those unfamiliar with the evolution of biological life
the development of embrios or computers,
a bootstrapped process is where a set of very simple individual
initial correspondences or commands are, once set up,
followed by the next logical
level of slightly more extended correspondences or commands
and so forth until a potentially infinitely complex system
can be developed from an originally minimal amount of program code.)
An initial step of a simple method of making such a correpondence might
be to initially touch, by correspondence to an infinite series of multiples
of a prime number (- perhaps twos with the infinite series 2,4,6,8,...),
the initial element only of some infinite thing
- such as (using base 10) the number 0.1 in every possible dimension
of space, then to proceed to another infinite thing and count next
using another set of prime multiples - perhaps threes - but excuding all
multiples of the base of the initial counting series (which I chose as 2).
So that would go; 3,(exclude 6)9,(exclude 12)15,21,27,33,... .
Also each list of prime number based multiples
- with exclusion of all repeats from previous multiple lists -
can be itself broken into an infinite number of separate infinite
sequences according to the same original pattern of taking first the
multiples of 2, then of 3, then of 5, and so on through the prime numbers
and excluding repeats from earlier sequences in the later sequences.
So for instance the sequence of multiples of 2 can be further broken
into infinitely many sequences as follows; 4,8,12,16,20,... , 6,18,30,42,...
and so on, and likewise for multiples of 3 and 5 and 7 and the other
prime multiple sequences. So this second layer of complexity in the
algorithm creates another degree of subdivision of the natural numbers
into an infinite sequence of infinite sequences of infinite sequences.
Now this adding of a layer of complexity by breaking up subsequences
into further subsequences is a process that can be repeated infinitely
so that the natural numbers can
in principle never run out of infinite
sequences with which to count infinite sets of things in the eternal
universe, thus the natural numbers can in principle
count, by one to one correspondence, everything in eternity including
So every set or element of a set in eternity can be given a unique
identifying natural number - and of course the whole one-to-one
correspondence or matching can be re-ordered ad infinitum to assign
everything an alternative or repeat-match natural number
- and each matching can be assigned
one of the natural numbers within each matching - so that the matchings
are also self-referencing.
So, as there are an infinite number of infinite subsequences
in the natural number sequence one can proceed systematically
through the infinite number of infinite things in the universe -
by process of infinite layering of some systematic sequential process
that 'bootstraps' every infinite list of things onto the initial
numbers that spawn infinite sequences within the natural numbers.
As follows I will count one dimension of the real numbers
using the sequences that exist within the sequence 2,4,6,8,10,...
which are as follows: 4,8,12,16,20,... , then 6,18,30,42,... ,
and then 10,50,70,110,... etc... where the sequences have all common numbers
removed from the later sequences.
So then, the first sequence can count through all the real numbers
that exist between 0 and 1 inclusive by a process of halving and then
halving the halves etc - in other words,
first, listing all those rational numbers in base 2 between
0 and 1 inclusive and then simply defining all numbers
between 0 and 1 by adding base 2 fractions to each other
in a systematic infinite sequence - which defines real numbers
by systematically finding all the infinitely many finite sums
of base 2 fractions and the infinitely many infinite sums
of base 2 fractions in one infinite sequence.
So what results might be this systematic pattern: 0, 0.1, 0.01, 0.11, 0.001, 0.011, 0.101, 0.111,
0.0001, 0.0011, 0.0101, 0.0111, 0.1001, 0.1011, 0.1101, 0.1111, ...
You can work systematically through all the numbers that have
a particular number of places in base 2 and then go on to those numbers
with one more total number of places in base 2 etc...
So then, the first sequence can count through all the real numbers
that exist between 1 and -1 inclusive by a similar process that
process of halving and then halving the halves etc except for each number
other than 0 a negative number of the same size can be counted in along with
the positive number.
And then by similar halving process, the second sequence in the multiples
of 2 can count through the numbers between 2 and 1 inclusive of 2 but not 1,
and between -2 and -1 inclusive of -2 but not -1,
and so on for the third sequence and the rest of the sequences
towards the infinite limit - taking in all the real numbers in one dimension.
There are an infinite number of sequences in which to use these prime
number based counting series and an infinite number of orders in which
to sequence the various infinite things of the infinite creation...
The infinite range of time, proceeding
from a beginning of a creation at a (finite) point in history,
affords scope for creatures bound into this limited experience
with no infinite past,
to discover, as time progresses for them into the infinite future,
absolutely everything that can be
discovered, including the past that they did not at first experience...
Difference and similarity measure quantity or richness of distinguishableness
and sameness in any span of the mind.
Order is an asymmetric consideration of separation - involving more
difference than mere separation.
Order specifies more difference than separation - there are always
at least two orders for every separation - all the experiences
of existence may be ordered...
So beings-experiencers, through their experiences of order, they are
distinguishable from each other by the orders of their experience.
Order is more general than time - time is defined by order
- there are at least four sub-orders in eternity
- time, preference, cause and spatial order.
Order sequences everything in eternity:
- the reverse ordering of time
and the experiences of separation WITHOUT order;
- cause as equivalent to effect
- or time as mere directionless change
- or time with a lack of perception of change - time as space.
Time is the way in which the multiplicity of orders of experience
within time are all ordered together. Eternity holds two time directions
for this co-orderedness. Time is given orders of association in relation
to change - for any change things may be ordered two ways - 'before' and 'after'
the change.. Each time direction may be experienced separately
or together - from eternal past to eternal future and simultaneously from
eternal future to eternal past.
Eternal time orders all things including the experience of itself
- various passages through time in either direction either experienced
simultaneously or separately...
All imaginations of causual relationships are also ordered within time.
Time orders the order in which beings take turns
at existing so as to have experience.
Beings may for a time only experience time backwards...
or while experiencing it forwards they can also experience it
moving backwards to meet at some point in the 'middle'.
This middle point may vary.
Desire is pleasure taken in the forcing of plans onto the next change
- either force which takes effect or impotent force which doesn't.
There are degrees of force with which choices may be implemented also.
Beings may find themselves forcing things to come about with no
sense of choice because they lack an owning identity for the force.
Many times beings want to change and interact in chosen ways within their ranges
of permissible activity whilst other times they may merely choose
how to act without desiring what they choose.
Sometimes desire or choice remains in the abstract planning stage and finds
no greater or further form of actualisation. So we call the desires and choice
Beings with experience of causality can imagine causual influences -
causual experience may be cause of existence or change or direction of change.
The causual conception or force imagined to cause a change (perhaps in an
may be imagined to cause some imagination to actualise or cause an imagination
not to actualise.
Infinite variety: Why should an infinite length extending through eternal time
not be fit into a finite length of eternal time as well...
- The infinite line of the Real numbers maps onto any finite line within
itself... So for many beings infinite lengths of their experience within
eternity are contained within these finite life spans infinitely many times
in infinitely varied ways
- so that they repeat the whole at various intervals within the whole.
Thus the whole of an eternity is may be defined by containing holes
in which the rest of the eternity fits into in a repeating way so that
the hole also contains another smaller hole into which again fits
the eternity, so far defined, ad infinitum until all the infinitely
many holes within the holes are filled with the outer definition
repeated over and over towards the limit when the holes are infinitesimal.
Everything in eternity fits into an infinitely ordered Eternal-Whole which
can be mapped onto the natural numbers to an infinite degree in an infinitely
How? Any infinite ordering (possibly time line) can be re-ordered infinitely.
All the orderings can then be assigned to any particular set of
finite lines of the eternal time line which may lie within a particular
span of eternity. The ordering of the orderings in the time line can then
be re-ordered either for inclusion in another part of the same being's time
line or for another being's time line... In this sort of way
eternity or the eternal universe can get packed infinitely dense
The collective all's ordering of experience is greater than others
in that it can be perceived to have the most variety
of relationships towards all beings' individual orderings of experience
- in other words, the summation all can be interrelated to
all beings' individual orders of experience
(for instance according to causality or codification) in the
the way that has the greatest variety...
Cause is a glue that orders mutuality in existence
- an infinite collection of ways to connect things with an
arbitary abstract order - anything can be supposed to cause anything else -
in all there is one big cause network - the limit of re-ordering the
re-orderings of orders of experiencing experiences of various numbers
of beings' experience over various periods of their eternal life spans
-- some beings can experience more abstracted causual
concepts (imaginations of order relationships) than others yet all beings
are equally causual - part of the causual network - some causes can be
considered more causual than others - by associating the cause element more times
with the events considered. Some beings can be imagined
to cause things in a greater number of ways than others, whilst other beings
are causing things with more intense causuality...
It is possible in a particular line segment of some beings'
history to squeeze ever more infinite lines of history until an infinite
density of experience of change of information is reached relative
to other parallel lines of history of other beings less able to find
that richness of experience in the same period of historical time
(time by number of changes rather than as includes durations).
Relative to some other being who experiences only two things for that stretch
of historical time that happen to be in common with the experience
of this first being
- the first instant experience and the last instant experience
- the first being can be said to change infinitely fast relative to it
although the single change seems to take longer from the point of view of the
being experiencing an infinite amount of change of experience information
over the finite period.
This being, without the gaps in the shared experience, has the most
objective perception of length of historical time while the being
that only experiences the first and last two events may have a subjectively
limited perception of historical time.
Thus the objective-duration (subjective is the feeling of duration whereas
objective is based on the amount of events happening across the number of changes
involved in a time interval) of historical time perception over a finite period
is absolutely relative to the being that experiences the most instants
of sequential events of history over the finite period of historical time.
So historical time's essential clocks are infinitely information-dense
alternators - ...This is why the greater you become
in historical time the more 'inner' you are in historical time
- experiencing more of the richness of objective historical time...
The experience of subjective time between two contiguous instants of
objective historical time can feel short or long
- making the way we experience an objectively measured rate of
change seem subjectively quick and/or slow.
Imaginations may be experienced in an instant or
imagination may take time to operate and so allow people to imagine ordering
or asymetric abstract ways of considering the instantaneous experience
of a spatial dimension (such as causality)
over a greater than instant period of time. Instantaneous imagination
or experience is possible of if-then-scenarios ('if-then' is an ordering
or collection of imaginations of present connecting to future forming
a hypothetical (true for your present moment) plan of action
or collective view of possibility),
change (and so flux) and causality - and so strength (ability to stay the same),
power (ability to become different), and might (abilities to become more than
one outcome - possibly to remain the same and become different).
Imagination - the abstraction of experiences
with ambiguous identities or hypothetical elements
- exists in the present - before a change. Imagination of various pasts
is possible without actually entering the past and adding anything to it
yet fully enacted imaginations are indistinguishable from remaining imaginary
except for the existence of the change elements used to bring the actualisation.
All but one of the hypothetical outcomes of
a choice remain hypothetical.
To believe in God as Truth means to decide what you desire to choose based
on the assumption that your knowledge of Him is a reliable guide to outcomes
of choice - that hypothetical outcomes of hypothetical choices are either
to be desired to be chosen or not - regardless of what you infact choose.
All choice is then an endless instant-by-instant test of God's truthfulness
or your choice based on some other factor than faith in God's truthfulness.
Faith chooses, so does doubt. Faith has eyes - doubt does not,
- the question is - does using these eyes or refusing them get you the
outcome you desire. Faith says I see how to get what I choose
- doubt says I don't need to see what I choose and I have no plan
of how to choose other than waiting to find out what I end
up getting - personal caprice.
Faith makes use of a conscience and perhaps also a god while doubt
goes it alone. People decide to trust and stay trusting of eventual contented
happiness since it is this quality that endues history with worth.
Rulership is attaining a greater influence from your attentions, decisions
and efforts than another in such a way that your
influence also limits the influences of others. The causality of rulership
or potency expressed is called force - forces are qualities that have
strength to initiate change, potency to maintain change
against opposing forces, power to change quickly
(with greater density of experience-change in any particular period of
objective historical time) with might to have change and stasis as simultaneous
Many beings may spend time experiencing other's,
while others cannot experience them...
To participate willingly with the desire to change the experience
of other beings, one needs to know (or trust) that choosing a particular
personal experience will give another being a particular kind of experience
that they want or do not. To know (or trust) whether
they do or not one needs to come to experience something from the other
being's set of desires. This means knowing (or trusting) that parts of
our experience relate to the experience of other beings in particular ways
(perhaps according to simple rules)...
An experience that you may give someone else may perhaps be a various
experience or the same one that you willed towards them.
So we have our subjective expectation, belief and trust to be tested
by change and sequential outcome and the objective proof or knowledge
of how we originally observed or imagined things for ourselves.